| |
| |
|
|
|
“Allowing the writers to express their passion in their own way has helped 33 1/3 establish a firm position in the music-writing
canon.”
Review No two books in Continuum's 33 1/3 series are the same, because the publisher consistently encourages its authors to write about albums in different ways: Decemberists frontman Colin Meloy wrote about the Replacements' Let It Be in personal, coming-of-age terms, while Chris Ott wrote about the creation of Joy Division's Unknown Pleasures with historical and technological authority, mixed with obvious reverence and empathy for Ian Curtis. More recently, Carl Wilson described how the mass popularity of Celine Dion's Let's Talk About Love reflects the nature of our taste, while Kate Schatz wrote what is, essentially, lesbian erotica inspired by PJ Harvey's Rid of Me. Allowing the writers to express their passion in their own way has helped 33 1/3 establish a firm position in the music-writing
canon. Reading about music almost always depends on interest and appreciation for not just one artistic undertaking, but two:
writing and music. Continuum has, in most cases, combined these masterfully.
33 1/3 Greatest Hits: Volume 1 includes excerpts from the first 20 books, and its table of contents alone illustrates the series' diversity: the Beatles,
the Beach Boys, James Brown, the Ramones, the Rolling Stones, Led Zeppelin, Radiohead, ABBA, Neil Young, and Syd Barrett-era Pink Floyd are all represented. Choosing highlights would betray one's personal musical and cultural interests, but to offer just a
few: Ott's detailing of the groundbreaking recording techniques used by Martin Hannett during Unknown Pleasures' recording sessions, and particularly his explanation of "digital delay"; Andy Miller's breakneck, heavily footnoted account
of the creation of The Kinks Are the Village Green Preservation Society; and finally, Jim Fusilli's thoughtful analysis of Brian Wilson's quiet but steady control of Pet Sounds and its reception by the pop-music world.
As editor David Barker acknowledges, taking "something so visceral, so immediate, so downright entertaining" as an album and
transferring it into words has created a collection that isn't for everybody. But for anyone with a passion for music, what
these writers bring to the series is just as visceral, immediate, and entertaining. - Tom Roberge
|
| back to top |
 |
| |
| NONFICTION |
 |
It's So You edited by Michelle Tea
|
|
 |


|
| Published: |
September 2007 |
|
| Pages: |
293 |
|
| Publisher: |
Seal Press |
|
Links: Book site
The F-Word Review |
|
|
|
“Body politics is a crucial conflict between fashion and feminism, and It's So You does its best to investigate it on a personal level.”
Review Editor Michelle Tea, co-founder of feminist collective Sister Spit, presents It's So You: 35 Women Write About Personal Expression Through Fashion and Style, an anthology of stories that bend and blur the idea of fashion into a wonderfully messy conduit connecting female individuality
to feminism.
Through wearable designs and makeup, It's So You shows how women constantly reinvent and regenerate their own individuality. From dressing like David Bowie in Cleveland to
changing outfits, gender preferences, and sexual partners in downtown NYC circa 1977, contributor Adele Bertei empowers herself
by seeing fluidity in sex and fashion. Likewise, Jill Soloway's essay addresses a more subtle flexibility in everyday identities — the simple act of chopping off her hair is a reflection
of how she wants to be treated as a woman. In this sense, fashion and feminism constantly refract in a proverbial mirror of
looks and signifiers.
Thematically, It's So You also centers on how women relate to their bodies. Cookie Woolner embraces the statements bigger women make in fashion, and
Kim Gordon questions the idea of exposed female body parts among celebrities as "the ultimate expression and delusion of free will."
Body politics is a crucial conflict between fashion and feminism, and It's So You does its best to investigate it on a personal level, while eschewing any one overriding first-, second-, or third-wave feminist agenda.
Instead, this anthology explores clothing as a genuine transference of ideas — traded among strangers in thrift stores or
between friends and lovers, solidifying the bond of expression. Contributor Debbie Rasmussen remembers trying on her grandmother's zany marshmallow-covered dress as a child, Rhiannon Argo contemplates wearing a wig found next to an abandoned bicycle, and Diane di Prima compares communal clothes of the '60s to a poetic experience of living someone else's dream. In this sense, the most spectacular
fashion statements in our own personal histories come from other people.
Laura Fraser explains that "the great thing about fashion, if you don't follow it but use it, is that you can express whatever
you want." Just like feminism, fashion is a distinct language, articulating how each woman feels about her own identity, body,
and history. - Stacy Elaine Dacheux
|
back to top
|
| |
|
|